Skip to main content

An Unbiased Source on Climate Change

Also known as a "Needle in a Haystack"

The Copenhagen Diagnosis was originally a book created by 26 individual leading climate change experts around the world. It was mainly created to serve as an in-depth analysis of all the recent scientific data surrounding global warming in the early 2000's. This data was then condensed down and prepared as a report for a climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark in December of 2009. The book can be purchased online and the report itself can also be downloaded for free. The executive summary is a quick and easy to read 1 page summary of each of the topics that the book presents. This can be found by clicking here.

The summary on it's own is a good source of information but the actual report is even better. The summary has a few key points that it makes that is good information to cite for almost any research paper. For starters, it announces that the original models for rising sea levels were off almost by a factor of two and that, by 2100, sea levels were more likely to rise 2-3 meters. Along with this, they state that even after global warming slows (whether by manmade power or not it seems) we should still expect to see a rise in sea level over the coming centuries. They also go on, in the final to paragraph to summarize what exactly must be done in order to stabilize the climate. They cite that we will have to reduce our per capita emissions down to under 1 metric ton of CO2 by 2050. Which is 80-95% below the usage of developed nations as of 2000.

The main reason that this can be viewed as a good source is that it was created by so many different people with so many different sources. All of which are listed clearly with background descriptions on each experiment and scientist. On the author's page of the website, they list the occupation of each author at the time. As an example, the following are direct quotes from the website containing each author's bio;
Bindschadler, Robert
"Robert Bindschadler is Chief Scientist of the Laboratory 
for Hydrospheric and Biospheric Processes at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 
USA, a Senior Fellow of NASA Goddard, an AGU Fellow and 
past President of the International Glaciological Society."

Mann, Michael
"Michael E. Mann is a Professor in the Department 
of Meteorology at Penn State University, USA, 
Director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center, 
and a Lead Author of the IPCC Third Assessment Report."


Comments

  1. Very interesting source! I like that you went and found a more "primary" source, rather than something more distilled. This report nicely summarized the scientific evidence.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Movie Clip - Titan A.E.

Titan A.E. - Earth is Dead and So is Physics Titan A.E: A Death Star on Steroids Picture a literal giant cannon that shoots pure energy into an object for massive cataclysmic damage. Picture it splitting the Earth into hundreds of tiny pieces destroying everything you know and love and picture it wiping out the moon with its large chunks of debris. Wasn’t that fun? That’s basically the opening scene to the movie Titan A.E. ; an animated sci-fi film about a dude name kayle who has to go on this mission through the galaxy to find a spaceship his dad built that can literally create a planet. This lack of care for physics is shown in the first opening scene of the movie that I just talked about. Take a look:    Basically, big alien ship comes to earth, big alien ship powers up its laser, laser destroys Earth, earth destroys moon, and we are left to ponder how the heck everything that just happened actually happened. Well there are some things that we can analyze abo...
Armageddon: The End of Physics (and life) as we Know it Armageddon is one of those movies that everyone knows about I think? There's no doubt that it's at least a half decent movie and one worthy of watching if you've got a spare 2 hours. However, the whole "let's blow up an asteroid with a nuke and have the two halves of the asteroid miss us entirely" thing, is utterly false and impossible to do. In actual practice, one nuke would barely separate each of the asteroid pieces a football field apart from one another by the time it reaches the movies "0 barrier". However, it does pose an interesting question. In the event that earth does come into the crosshairs of an "extinction level" asteroid, what on earth (no pun intended) do we do? The Plan So, although throwing nukes at the thing last minute would give a great last-minute fireworks show, it won't work. If we are going to actually hit this thing with nukes, we need to be able ...