Skip to main content

Movie Clip - Titan A.E.

Titan A.E. - Earth is Dead and So is Physics

Titan A.E: A Death Star on Steroids
Picture a literal giant cannon that shoots pure energy into an object for massive cataclysmic damage. Picture it splitting the Earth into hundreds of tiny pieces destroying everything you know and love and picture it wiping out the moon with its large chunks of debris. Wasn’t that fun?
That’s basically the opening scene to the movie Titan A.E.; an animated sci-fi film about a dude name kayle who has to go on this mission through the galaxy to find a spaceship his dad built that can literally create a planet. This lack of care for physics is shown in the first opening scene of the movie that I just talked about. Take a look:

  

Basically, big alien ship comes to earth, big alien ship powers up its laser, laser destroys Earth, earth destroys moon, and we are left to ponder how the heck everything that just happened actually happened. Well there are some things that we can analyze about this scene in order to determine if this laser beam of death is remotely possible.
Let’s start at the obvious question, just how fast are those pieces of Earth going? Well, we actually have a perfect way to measure that. We know the distance between the earth and the moon, and the time between when the earth exploded and when the earth hit the moon can be measured with the movie. So, according to the movie. We can do the following calculation.
            Well, we now know that the pieces of Earth are moving approximately 32 million meters per second (11% the speed of light) after it’s blown to bits by the blue dudes. Now we can ask the question, how much energy would that take? And, is that even possible to create in the manner that the bad guys did?
Well we can use the equations for kinetic energy to find out how much kinetic energy the pieces of Earth has as they are moving. That energy must have all come from the energy released into the earth by the weapon. So, knowing that we can do the following calculation. Note: In the following calculation “m” represents the mass of the earth.
Ok, so now we know that the energy needed for that is massive. Absolutely massive. For reference, that is the same energy produced in 7.3 x 1029 tons of TNT. So, what in the universe could possibly generate that much energy? Well, the most powerful thing that I can immediately think of is the sun. So, let’s start there. Our sun has a property to it called luminosity which is how much energy it produces over a unit time. Our sun has a luminosity of 3.84 x 1026 watts. This means that we can then find how much time it would take for the sun to generate that much energy.
 

            So, even our very own sun sitting right next to us, providing light to all the planets in our solar system and sustaining life as we know it, would require 250,000 years to produce that much energy. However, in the movie, the aliens charged up their laser to that amount of energy in under a minute.

            The rest of this movie is honestly pretty good but it has no intention of being scientifically accurate. There is even a scene in the movie where the magical sphericalspaceshipp in the opening scene create a planet in a little under a minute by breaking apart a space icicle field with some other lasers. In summary, blowing up the earth with that much energy is impossible without a shadow of a doubt. It would have been so much easier just to bomb the planet with nukes to create a nuclear fallout. 

Comments

  1. Good analysis. Honestly, I expected to velocity of the Earth chunks to come out faster than the speed of light.

    It's interesting that there are events in astrophysics that do produce the amounts of energy you are talking about in relatively short periods of time. A supernova, for instance, blows apart an entire star in just a couple seconds.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Twin Paradox Problem In Contact

It really seems like the producers of the movie contact were out of touch  with their physics in some parts of the movie (sorry for the pun). Nearing the end of the movie the writers made an error in their physics and it really begs to be rewritten. So, here is my attempt at it. Nearing the end of the movie, Jodie Foster's character comes back from her trip into the space void after falling through the contraption. In essence, what appears to be 18 hours in Jodie's reference frame, is actually only 1 or 2 seconds in the earth's frame of reference. This is sort of right, however, it's backward as to what relatively and the twin paradox actually states should happen. It should have been 1 or 2 seconds in Jodies from of reference and 18 hours for the people on earth if she was traveling at the speed of light for any given portion of time. Even warping space-time with a warp hole would cause the same effects such as the movie suggests happens. So, in essence, Jodie would
Mission Impossible III: No Physics Required So, in my eyes, "Mission Impossible III" seemed like a hot mess. Some of the scenes where extremely cringe worthy, there were plot holes the size of the grand canyon, and Tom Cruise seemed to be the only half decent actor in my opinion. However, the main gripe I have with this movie is much nerdier than that. Some of the physics in this movie are appalling. Some are normal Hollywood cliches, some are downright crazy stunts, and some are just downright illogical at best. I'm very interested in being able to determine whether or not these scenes really were accurate. Even though we know that, because they are action movie scenes, some of them are inherently incorrect. None the less, listing out the information that's given to use would definitely shed some light on whether or not some of these scenes are even physically possible in the real world. Shanghai Fulcrum   The first scene I want to touch on, screams for ph